logoalt Hacker News

bofadeezyesterday at 12:59 AM6 repliesview on HN

No obviously not. Lots of machines replace workers.

Why would taking scarce resources away from productive businesses and allocating to unproductive things be good for anyone other than government bureaucrats?


Replies

varencyesterday at 1:08 AM

If full AGI dreams are achieved and 80% of jobs disappear, leading to mass unemployment, then we need to do something to support the huge numbers of people that no longer have any income. Taxes to support a UBI program seem one solution. Or maybe the labor market can shift to find opportunities for humans that AI can't replace and we'd avoid the mass unemployment.

But feels like we're a long way from that right now.

show 2 replies
smallmancontrovyesterday at 1:22 AM

> productive

According to the economic notion of value, which is unique among definitions of "value" in being wealth-weighted, enshrining "mega gainz in brokerage accounts" as the ultimate social good while shrugging its shoulders at the plight of the ahem low-weight individual.

show 1 reply
CrossVRyesterday at 1:09 AM

Infrastructure is not unproductive, even machines need roads. I don't think self-driving vehicles should be exempt from road tax.

show 1 reply
harimau777yesterday at 1:39 AM

It would benefit the people you are calling "unproductive things". That's basically the point.

xg15yesterday at 1:18 AM

Unproductive things like building roads, the electrical grid, water lines, schools, etc?

show 1 reply
nemomarxyesterday at 1:18 AM

I mean this is how all welfare works, isn't it? If as a society we think it's important to reallocate some resources so that people can get food in bread lines, we generally do that.