logoalt Hacker News

erehwebyesterday at 8:11 AM4 repliesview on HN

Looking at the actual article, the people suggesting taxes on AI are American Nobel laureate Edmund Phelps, and Bill Gates, founder of MSFT. The Europeans suggest more general taxes on capital instead.


Replies

unglaublichyesterday at 8:23 AM

The latter makes sense. We also don't let steam engines and carts pay taxes just because they 'replace' (=displace) human labor.

Don't tax tools or income, tax the accumulation of it: wealth.

show 4 replies
fainpulyesterday at 8:42 AM

The problem is that rich people and large companies usually go to great lengths to avoid taxes, use loopholes or get special deals (and with great success). The missing tax income has to come from the middle class, who can't avoid it.

With increased automation, this only gets more extreme.

show 3 replies
useumixyesterday at 9:14 AM

Directly taxing AI is very hard. Imagine if a company had to pay taxes for every AI agent operating in the U.S. or the E.U. As if they were regular employees. Big corporations would simply move the AI agents to countries without taxes.

show 3 replies