> The premise still strikes me as a ridiculous one: Am I possibly a more affluent customer because there is a high pile rug under the coffee table?
I've no idea about rug pile depth, but I'd have thought a simple link between square footage and location would be a reasonable proxy for that affluency.
Sure, but a simple address database seems like a lot easier way to get there than robots roving around houses with LIDAR?
Nothing to hide, huh
A simpler signal: Did I buy the $250 Roomba 105 or the $900 Roomba Max 705?