logoalt Hacker News

gjsman-1000yesterday at 12:09 PM6 repliesview on HN

The top 1% already pays more than 40% of all federal income tax at a 26.09% effective rate. The bottom 50% has an effective rate of 3.7% and contributes only 3% of all tax revenues.

https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/latest-federal-in...

How about the rich say that 50% of the economy should pay their fair share?


Replies

smallmancontrovyesterday at 12:37 PM

> income tax

They don't get money through income! They get most of it through capital gains or unrealized capital gains which are taxed at special low rates and zero rates respectively.

It's transparently self-serving and completely indefensible -- though I'm sure you'll try.

show 1 reply
titzeryesterday at 12:22 PM

If we limited individual wealth to $999 million--just outright capped it, and enforced that--it would not impact these people in the slightest.

What it would impact is how easily these people could influence the political system and get themselves out of trouble.

At $400 billion net worth, Elon Musk could retire one hundred thousand times. He literally wrote multi-million dollar checks to various politicians and ran an illegal pay-for-votes scheme in Pennsylvania. And he'll face zero consequences for it.

show 2 replies
micromacrofootyesterday at 3:04 PM

Top 1% of the US holds 30% of the country's wealth

Bottom 50% only 2% of wealth

50% of the economy my ass, these takes don't even pass basic accounting logic these days

iso1631yesterday at 1:45 PM

> How about the rich say that 50% of the economy should pay their fair share?

Someone with $1b of assets gets far more value from a modern stable western society than someone with $10k of assets

fzeroraceryesterday at 12:42 PM

> How about the rich say that 50% of the economy should pay their fair share?

How exactly do you propose that they pay their fair share when they literally do not have the money or assets to do so? Are you proposing modern day slavery? Perhaps people selling their family? I'm curious what happens if you take this line of thought to it's actual conclusion.

show 4 replies
komali2yesterday at 12:23 PM

I did a bit of mild googling.

1% of Americans control 30% of the wealth of the nation, and apparently 12% of property.

It's more than reasonable that people with that much wealth to their name pay the vast majority of the taxes, as it used to be.

From a nation building perspective, there's no reason to allow a couple hundred people to wield 52,000,000,000,000$ worth of assets. It means the economy has gotten far too clumpy and needs some redistribution. This isn't even really all that anti-capitalist. Capitalism can't survive long term without budding up against a government that regulates it.

show 1 reply