logoalt Hacker News

billy99kyesterday at 1:20 PM5 repliesview on HN

Would you also be open to paying taxes in your 401k yearly based on unrealized gains?


Replies

tossandthrowyesterday at 1:48 PM

In the country I live the 401k equivalent is taxed yearly on gains (and again as income when I retire), and I think that is fine - I get a world class society in return (you guessed right, it is a Nordic country)

so the answer is yes.

However, i did not go as far as proposing anything. You are assigning value on my statement.

I merely pointed out that it is a mute point to say that you can not use your unrealized gains.

pixl97yesterday at 1:27 PM

When those unrealized gains are spread across 10s-100s of millions of people it's fine because statistically gains are always being realized. As those holdings get further concentrated that stops happening.

airstrikeyesterday at 1:22 PM

If I take out loans against those unrealized gains? Hell yes.

nullocatoryesterday at 4:28 PM

Absolutely, as long as billionaires, hedge funds, and vcs are also paying a progressive tax rate on their shares and holdings.

solumunusyesterday at 4:56 PM

Of course, as long as the tax is progressive. Custodians of assets almost all charge an annual feel on unrealised gains, it’s hardly a foreign concept…