logoalt Hacker News

mrcrm9494yesterday at 2:00 PM6 repliesview on HN

this headline is a bit misleading on the first read, since it only affects functional (f)MRI, which is controversial since a longer time. a prominent example is the activity that has been detected in a dead salmon


Replies

SubiculumCodeyesterday at 3:36 PM

The dead salmon was just a lesson in failing to correct for multiple comparisons.

show 1 reply
kspacewalk2yesterday at 2:13 PM

It's not that fMRI itself is controversial, it's that it is prone to statistical abuse unless you're careful in how you analyse the data. That's what the dead salmon study showed - some voxels will appear "active" purely by statistical chance, so without correction you will get spurious activations.

show 1 reply
giancarlostoroyesterday at 2:33 PM

So, is fMRI like "fast" MRI? Can someone fill the rest of us mortals in on this? :)

show 2 replies
ErroneousBoshyesterday at 7:15 PM

If you apply enough gain and filtering to an unknown signal, eventually you'll pull something out of it that you can convince yourself is what you're looking for.

kgartenyesterday at 2:15 PM

wondering why you are downvoted. You are right, though it's kind of inferred that the author means fMRI as the title focuses on brain activity only.

freehorseyesterday at 2:22 PM

Structural MRI does not record brain activity, because it is, like, structural, not functional.

Structural MRI is even more abused, where people find "differences" between 2 groups with ridiculously small sample sizes.