logoalt Hacker News

sciencesamalast Tuesday at 5:55 PM5 repliesview on HN

what are the opensource alternatives to selfhosted runners ?


Replies

xp84last Tuesday at 6:15 PM

That's just the point. Selfhosted runners were the alternative. The only alternative for "runners" is Github-hosted, 200%-markup runners.

Now the only alternative is to move builds, CI, etc. off of GitHub's platform entirely, and maybe your source control as well. In other words, a big pain. Github seems to have entered peak encrapification: the point where they openly acknowledge rent-seeking as their product approach, fully deprecating "building the best, most reliable, trustworthy product." Now it's just "Pay us high margins because the effort to migrate off is big and will take too long to break even."

Basically the modern day Heroku business model.

abhiyerralast Tuesday at 7:36 PM

https://woodpecker-ci.org/

show 2 replies
featherlesslast Tuesday at 6:15 PM

Genuinely curious about this as well. It's a major bummer that self-hosted infra can't be used to validate GitHub Pull Requests now; basically means I'll have to move my entire workflow off of GitHub so that everything can be integrated reasonably again.

show 2 replies
cweaganslast Tuesday at 6:27 PM

Gitea + Gitea Actions works approximately as well as GHA. For GitHub specifically, you're back to setting PR checks + commit status programmatically through the API.

Cyclenerdlast Tuesday at 7:30 PM

Woodpecker CI supports GitHub: https://woodpecker-ci.org/