logoalt Hacker News

mfcllast Tuesday at 6:43 PM3 repliesview on HN

They still run the whole orchestration.

If you don't want to pay, you'd have to not use GitHub Actions at all, maybe by using their API to test new commits and PRs and mark them as failed or passed.


Replies

codeflolast Tuesday at 7:00 PM

One problem is that GitHub Actions isn't good. It's not like you're happily paying for some top tier "orchestration". It's there and integrated, which does make it convenient, but any price on this piece of garbage makes switching/self-hosting something to seriously consider.

show 2 replies
bad_haircut72last Tuesday at 6:59 PM

Everyone who has Actions built into their workflow now has to go change it. Microsoft just conned a bunch more people with the same classic tech lock-in strategy they've always pursued, people are right to be pissed. The only learning to take away is never ever use anything from the big tech companies, even if it seems easier or cheaper right now to do so, because they're just waiting for the right moment to try and claw it back from you.

show 1 reply
nextaccounticlast Tuesday at 6:47 PM

Can someone share a Github bot that doesn't depend on actions?

I mean maybe https://github.com/rust-lang/bors is enough to fully replace Github Actions? (not sure)

show 2 replies