logoalt Hacker News

bencedlast Tuesday at 7:46 PM4 repliesview on HN

Are there bring-your-own-agent CI platforms that don't have pricing structures like this? Buildkite and CircleCI do.


Replies

olafmollast Tuesday at 9:45 PM

CircleCI does only charge for self-hosted runners generated egress and/or artifact storage:

"Any Network Egress to CircleCI will be charged. At this current time, this includes CircleCI Caches, Workspaces, and Artifacts and will be charged at the normal rate according to your Usage Controls.

The only network traffic that will result in billing is accrued through restoring caches and workspaces, and downloading artifacts to self-hosted runners. Retention of artifacts, workspace, and cache objects will result in billing for storage usage.

Since your builds will not be running on CircleCI's Infrastructure, you will not be charged compute credits"

https://support.circleci.com/hc/en-us/articles/2064321965685...

I think that's fair. In my personal opinion most people started using GitHub Actions because it “came for free with the VCS and/or our MS contract” and it was “good enough for the job”. Now might be a good time to look around at the alternatives again. There is a reason that f.e. CircleCI is doing fully focused CI/CD for 10+ years and is still going strong. Plenty of businesses don’t want to put all their eggs in one (MS) basket, for all kinds of reasons. I guess today one of these reasons became obvious.

Disclaimer: I work at CircleCI.

show 1 reply
icyyesterday at 12:08 AM

https://tangled.org's spindle CI is pretty much this. It's not quite as powerful as Actions yet, but we're getting there!

fishpen0last Tuesday at 8:25 PM

gitlab