logoalt Hacker News

p-e-wyesterday at 10:57 AM14 repliesview on HN

Firefox has a market share around 3%. Even most technologists stopped using it long ago. Many banks and government websites don’t even support it anymore and loudly tell people to use Chrome instead, especially in developing countries.

Nothing can kill Firefox, because it’s already dead for all practical purposes.


Replies

tdayesterday at 11:01 AM

I use Firefox as my daily browser. If i have a website that fails to work, I might try chrome maybe once every two months. And then it usually also doesn't work. So for all browsing I do on the internet, Firefox works like a charm

show 1 reply
graemepyesterday at 11:01 AM

> Many banks and government websites don’t even support it anymore and loudly tell people to use Chrome instead, especially in developing countries.

I cannot remember the last time I came across one myself.

show 5 replies
ojosilvayesterday at 11:42 AM

3% market share is 150 million active users give or take. That's no death by any count in the software world.

Gosh, I really wish Mozilla would just dig into their user-base and find a way to adequately become sustainable... or find a way to make it work better as a foundation that is NOT maintained by Google, ie like the Wiki Foundation. I do spend a LOT of time in FF, can't anyone see there's a value beyond selling ads and personal info that could make Mozilla more sustainable, dependable and resilient?

csinyesterday at 11:44 AM

This 3% number is deceptive.

The whole desktop market is cratering.

I was talking to a reddit mod a few months ago. He was looking at the subreddit stats. 95% of his users were on mobile.

Think about that. We desktop users are dinosaurs.

So FireFox having a 3% market share might actually mean more than half of desktop users are on FireFox.

show 2 replies
Cthulhu_yesterday at 11:08 AM

When they say "don't support it anymore", does that mean they're back to the IE era of using Chrome specific technologies so it doesn't work in any browser, do they use user-agent sniffing and show a big popup, or is it just that they're not testing it in FF anymore? The latter shouldn't be an issue as long as they use standards, the only thing they would run into in this day and age is browser specific bugs - but Safari seems to have that the most.

show 1 reply
mosquitobitenyesterday at 11:29 AM

that 3% is of total users including mobile which chrome is king because it's basically force fed to users. this is important because there is no choice with browsers for the common mobile user, most of them don't know what is a browser even if they used it every day. also in the 2000s IE was king because guess what? that was what came preinstalled with winxp

seanhunteryesterday at 9:43 PM

This is completely untrue in my experience. I use firfox exclusively on my personal laptop and have done exclusively for years. I don’t even have chromium installed.

I can’t remember the last time a website was unusable on firefox. It’s certainly not common.

OkayPhysicistyesterday at 4:50 PM

Most of those sites are doing a little move called "lying". I occasionally (once every couple of months) run into a site claiming to not support Firefox. I can't recall a single site that wasn't a tech demo of some bleeding edge feature of Chrome that didn't magically start working when I turned on my Chrome UserAgent.

(Hey, if you work at Snapchat: fix your shit. Your desktop site is by far the most mainstream website I've come across that lies like this)

J_Shelby_Jyesterday at 8:37 PM

> Even most technologists stopped using it long ago.

Funny, because chrome has always been the browser for laptops users, while Firefox has always been the browser of power users.

iso1631yesterday at 11:13 AM

Wikimedia stats from last year put it at 15% of desktop browsers, ahead of Safari and Edge.

show 2 replies
yreadyesterday at 12:19 PM

My software stopped working because its drawing on canvas in a way that causes firefox to glitch with hw acceleration enabled. Not one of my customers/users complained

show 1 reply
walrus01yesterday at 11:10 AM

> Many banks and government websites don’t even support it

Because their web developers are too lazy to write anything to proper standards. They're doing some kind of lazy "Check for Chrome, because everyone must be running that, if not, redirect to an Unsupported page".

I've yet to find a website that "refuses" to work in Firefox which doesn't work just fine when I use a user agent switching extension to present a standard Chrome on MacOS or Chrome on Windows useragent.

show 1 reply
timeonyesterday at 11:48 AM

Have not used Chrome-based browsers 3+ years and never had problem with Firefox. Sometimes Safari was not working 100% - but nothing serious. Maybe it is because, only page from google I use is Youtube; however Firefox has best experience there, even better than Chrome - thanks to proper uBlock Origin.

sharkenyesterday at 11:00 AM

Given the current state of the Chrome family of browsers and the anti adblocker stance from Google, i'd think that alone would guarantee Firefox a steady user base.

Not sure how users cope with Chrome-based browsers and intrusive ads.

show 2 replies