alt Hacker NewsThe question is, to what purpose are you looking at those 5%? I reckon it’s because you don’t really trust the vibes. In that sense, you’re not vibe-coding.
The question is, to what purpose are you looking at those 5%? I reckon it’s because you don’t really trust the vibes. In that sense, you’re not vibe-coding.
If that's the case i feel like we need some other term. As you're saying that someone who ignores 95% of the written code is not vibe coding. That to me says we need a term that describes "i ignored almost all code" type of "coding" that LLMs provide.
I don't care about the 5% difference. I care about the bulk, the amount of bugs and poor logic that can slip in, etc. I have no attachment to the term "vibe coded", but it's useless to me if it doesn't describe this scenario.