> That doesn’t mean Rust provides no value over C
The real question is "does it provide this greater value for _less_ effort?"
The answer seems to be: "No."
No, the real question is whether it provides that greater value for a reasonably acceptable, commensurate effort. Looking for greater value with less effort is looking for a free lunch, and we all know TANSTAAFL.
> The answer seems to be: "No."
It is actually "Yes."
No, the real question is whether it provides that greater value for a reasonably acceptable, commensurate effort. Looking for greater value with less effort is looking for a free lunch, and we all know TANSTAAFL.