logoalt Hacker News

incrudiblelast Thursday at 1:33 PM3 repliesview on HN

> Neither was slavery. Was that OK too? And to clarify (though it’s worrying this point needs to be made), I mean morally.

From the perspective of a pre-abolitionist society, it evidently was, but that's not a political issue you're gonna have to deal with in 2025. Consider yourself lucky.

> Fascism has a very clear definition.

First of all, that isn't true. Secondly, even if it was true, it wouldn't matter. You are using the word as a though-terminating cliché. That doesn't work in the long run, you'll just get ignored. As a result, you can pat yourself on the back for calling out fascism while all the behaviors and actions that you believe to be fascist are mainstreamed and affecting people's lives. If I was you, I'd be more worried about criticizing those behaviors and actions on their merits (or lack thereof), rather than trying to tie them to some textbook definition fascism and dismissing them wholesale.


Replies

wahnfriedenlast Thursday at 10:07 PM

Slavery is not only legal in 2025 USA, it is in greater numbers than back then. There are 40-50 million enslaved worldwide today.

show 1 reply
latexrlast Thursday at 2:23 PM

> From the perspective of a pre-abolitionist society, it evidently was

I sincerely doubt the slaves would agree with you. Just because one group was economically and societally OK with it, doesn’t make it morally OK.

> but that's not a political issue you're gonna have to deal with in 2025.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_21st_century

Again, I doubt the slaves would agree with you.

> Consider yourself lucky.

That’s a really strange comment. What does that mean?

> First of all, that isn't true.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism

Seems pretty clear to me.

> You are using the word as a though-terminating cliché.

Of course I’m not, I barely use the word. Pay attention to the person you’re replying to. What you’re doing is putting me in a box of other people you’ve seen online and making a bunch of wrong assumptions. You’re not engaging with the arguments, you’re fighting against a straw man in your imagination.

show 2 replies
magicalistlast Thursday at 2:08 PM

> From the perspective of a pre-abolitionist society, it evidently was, but that's not a political issue you're gonna have to deal with in 2025. Consider yourself lucky.

...do you not also consider yourself lucky about this? Weird phrasing.