Don't be silly, it's brought up as a support clause that is also lacking any factual evidence.
I’ve never seen a thread so reflective of this meme:
“It's amazing how much leftist discourse is just them pretending not to understand things, thus making discourse impossible.”
Why are you so hung up on scrutinising Blow’s words to defend him, but then take the critic’s words with a broad general brush to dismiss them?
You even decry the lack of factual evidence in the critic’s case, but for some reason said nothing about Blow doing the same first.
That’s what looks silly to me. You’re not treating them the same.
They're reading the statement correctly, imo.