logoalt Hacker News

danarislast Thursday at 2:55 PM1 replyview on HN

I'm sorry, but you're wrong. I am not remotely misremembering, and I'll thank you not to tell me what's happening in my own head.

IE 6 stood stagnant for years, while the W3C moved on without them, and there was no new version.

> The something being the other browsers. Chrome and Firefox.

And can you name a single thing Firefox does right, that Chrome didn't do first, or that came from an actual accepted web standard (not a proposal, not a de-facto standard because Chrome does it), that Safari doesn't do?


Replies

littlestymaarlast Thursday at 4:52 PM

> and there was no new version.

Yes there was… IE 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11.

The reason why IE 6 kept haunting us all was because later versions were never available on Windows XP.

> actual accepted web standard

The only thing for which there is an actual standard that matters is JavaScript itself (or rather ECMAScript) and on that front Apple has pretty much always been a laggard.

Saying “Apple is compliant with all of W3C standards” is a bit ridiculous when this organization was obsolete long before Microsoft ditched IE. And Apple itself acknowledge that, themselves being one of the founding parties of the organization that effectively superseded W3C (WHATWG).

show 1 reply