logoalt Hacker News

bilekaslast Thursday at 10:17 PM1 replyview on HN

I'm not sure why this is so downvoted given the climate.

I guess it's the AI driven approach. These things, critical infra, are always done better with a few eyes in it.. introducing irresponsible ideas of "I'll just remake it with Claude without knowing the underlying infra" can hit a few nerves, also add a few lower level bugs, exploits etc.

I don't think it's fair for the downvoted but I think it's worth discussing where we draw the line.

Edit: I think AI is a tool not a replacement.


Replies

amlutolast Thursday at 11:04 PM

Sigh. I should probably have clarified the vibe-coded part. I think this entire project could he done with rather little total code, and that the code could be written entirely by humans without an immense programmer-hour commitment or by humans with AI help (fully human-in-the-loop) even faster.

My actual point is that GitHub Actions is kind of an unusual product. Many big cloud things solve what seems to be a simple problem but the actual requirements are much harder than they might appear, and replacing them well wouldn’t be very complex. But IMO GitHub Actions in particular is a bunch of complexity that does not actually solve the problem that needs solving very well; a small bespoke solution would actually be better.