logoalt Hacker News

beezlebroxxxxxxyesterday at 5:27 PM2 repliesview on HN

They I understand it: There was a deal to ban TikTok unless ownership changes --- the original intention was no Chinese involvement, but now it seems "ownership change" means the ownership is amicable to the current president. There was also something of a grace period for when that ban went into effect if TikTok could show they were actively in the process of finding a new owner. The current president basically just kept insisting that grace period was in effect while he constructed a bid for ownership that aligned with his and his friends (business) interests.

Basically, Congress did not do its job and ignored the very law they voted for.


Replies

Buttons840yesterday at 5:33 PM

Congress can't really ignore a law though, anymore than I can.

Am I ignoring the TikTok law? No, because it's not my job to enforce it.

The executive branch is the one that ignores the law.

show 1 reply
mattnewtonyesterday at 5:31 PM

> Basically, Congress did not do its job and ignored the very law they voted for.

It feels like this is increasingly the case. Not sure what the solutions are.