Protip: Any time you read "AI" in a news article, substitute the phrase "faster, more numerous, and confidently incorrect." I don't think we need "confidently incorrect" weather models. Who is asking for this?
If it were LLM I’d agree, but that’s not the case here.
These models actually outperform traditional methods on many fronts, including accuracy a lot of the time. They are technically generative AI models, but they're definitely not LLMs.