logoalt Hacker News

lukanyesterday at 9:26 AM1 replyview on HN

"I had heard that tunnels were a good first step for rolling out super conducting cables, but that doesn’t seem to be a thing."

Yeah tunnels underground would be better for superconducting cables, but it is indeed not really a thing as the cooling and installing and maintainance would be waaaay more expensive, than just using higher voltage. Or if one really cares about the loss, use direct current - but we are talking aber very small distances here.

If superconducting would be easy, we likely just would have fusion plants everywhere with no need for transporting electricity long distances.


Replies

ferfumarmayesterday at 11:06 AM

> Or if one really cares about the loss, use direct current

I thought direct current had higher transmission losses vs AC

show 3 replies