logoalt Hacker News

flumpcakesyesterday at 9:16 PM3 repliesview on HN

I'm very surprised by the questions in this thread. There are some extremely basic things people are just not understanding. I suspect people hating on IPv6 have not spent the time with it. There is a difficulty in that it does behave quite differently to IPv4, and the lack of private addresses are also probably a shock.


Replies

transcriptaseyesterday at 10:18 PM

The basic thing proponents don’t understand is that nobody in their right mind can intuitively understand IPV6 addresses because they look like MAC addresses with trisomy and are a pain in the ass to remember or type for absolutely no benefit to the non-network engineer. And there are infinitely more people with home routers and a few dozen devices than there are people running ISPs, fortune 500s, and data centres. Play with your convolution all you want, in 20 years the rest of us will still be happily assigning 192.168.x.x and ignoring it. V4 space running out is no more the average persons problem than undersea cables or certificate authority.

show 3 replies
themafiatoday at 4:28 AM

> There is a difficulty in that it does behave quite differently to IPv4

Which can be fine if you have a /solid/ transition plan to move networks wholesale from v4 to v6. They absolutely failed on this point and almost purposefully refused to carry over any familiar mechanisms to make dual stack easier to manage.

It's a University protocol that escaped into commercial usage based mostly on false fears of global routing table size becoming unmanageable or impossible to store in RAM. The results are absolutely predictable.

tgsovlerkhgseltoday at 5:03 AM

I haven't spent a lot of time with my power grid either, but I do expect the light to go on when I press the switch.

(Needing to dedicate time for it is, to some extent, either a failure of the protocol or at least a contributor to the lack of adoption.)