logoalt Hacker News

dartharvatoday at 8:53 AM3 repliesview on HN

I think it's more the fact that they lied before nomination than the AI usage itself. Any institution is bound to disqualify a candidate if it discovers it was admitted on false grounds.

I wonder if the game directors had actually made their case beforehand, they would have perhaps been let to keep the award.

That said, the AI restriction itself is hilarious. Almost all games currently being made would have programmers using copilot, would they all be disqualified for it? Where does this arbitrary line start from?


Replies

oneeyedpigeontoday at 9:43 AM

> Almost all games currently being made would have programmers using copilot

I think that is almost certainly untrue, especially among indie games developers, who are often the most stringent critics of gen ai.

show 2 replies
pwdisswordfishytoday at 9:38 AM

> Almost all games currently being made would have programmers using copilot

Which LLM told you that?

show 1 reply
voidfunctoday at 9:29 AM

> That said, the AI restriction itself is hilarious. Almost all games currently being made would have programmers using copilot, would they all be disqualified for it? Where does this arbitrary line start from?

AI OK: Code

AI Bad: Art, Music.

It's a double standard because people don't think of code as creative. They still think of us as monkeys banging on keyboards.

Fuck 'em. We can replace artists.

show 4 replies