logoalt Hacker News

Italian Competition Authority Fines Apple $115M for Abusing Dominant Position

126 pointsby amarcheschitoday at 11:22 AM117 commentsview on HN

Comments

rdtsctoday at 2:32 PM

> privacy rules imposed by Apple for iOS devices, as of April 2021, on third-party developers of apps distributed through the App Store. In particular, third-party app developers are required to obtain specific consent for the collection and linking of data for advertising purposes through Apple’s ATT prompt

Wait, so they are punishing Apple because Apple makes it harder to spy on users.

What happens if Apple just exits the Italian market? They can create their own Apple competitor, I guess.

show 6 replies
earthnailtoday at 3:09 PM

Surprised by the negative comments here. Usually HN univocally complains about Apple‘s dominant App Store. Now a government fines them for it and some people are upset?

show 10 replies
runakotoday at 2:38 PM

This looks like it's targeted at the relationship between Apple and Italian developers. I guess this means Apple could also comply by kicking Italian developers out of the iOS developer program?

show 1 reply
dinkblamtoday at 3:02 PM

no year goes by without Italy imposing random >100m€ fines for 2-3 american tech companies. whenever they need money, they just hit another one without care whether actual laws were violated. the amount they take has no correlation to what has been blamed, only to how much the companies can afford to pay without threatening to leave the country.

the 'Guardia di Finanza' has a long standing tradition of trying to extort money without regards to actual laws. its not long ago that they told all companies 'if you pay X% more than your tax report says you own then we won't destroy your company'. more recently they went after the Agnelli family trying to extort money without having an actual case.

its not the rule of law, its simply Might makes Right or modern robber knights...

show 4 replies
ursAxZAtoday at 10:04 PM

I might be missing some procedural detail, but if there’s no formal “warning → fixed-window for correction → penalty” sequence, isn’t that just state overreach?

If the issue has existed for years, retroactively jumping straight to fines feels less like regulation and more like the government exploiting its timing advantage.

linhnstoday at 5:47 PM

I’m on the fence on this matter however they need to look at other actions of fellow big companies, for equality under the laws.

nicole_expresstoday at 2:28 PM

I'm so glad they're protecting us from Apple (checking document) making it too hard to collect personal data for advertising. Thanks, Italy

show 1 reply
fn348x2today at 3:04 PM

On the Euro, Maastricht Treaty circa. ratified in 1992.

Is certainly a leverage in Apple’s third-party research.

slowmovintargettoday at 2:27 PM

Apple's consent requirement isn't good enough for legal consent so third-parties have to ask twice, which "harms advertisers" trying to get at that juicy personal data.

lioeterstoday at 2:27 PM

OK now slap the wrists of Alphabet and Meta.

show 1 reply
troupotoday at 2:28 PM

Of all issues they chose "poor advertisers can't get their hands on user data"

sonuhiatoday at 2:29 PM

money laundering? a bribe? someone ink and track every single one of those dollars!

show 1 reply
wendgeabostoday at 3:00 PM

The government is everywhere prone to becoming the mafia.

concindstoday at 2:32 PM

> The Authority found the App Tracking Transparency (“ATT”) policy to restrict competition. [...]

> In particular, third-party app developers are required to obtain specific consent for the collection and linking of data for advertising purposes through Apple’s ATT prompt. However, such prompt does not meet privacy legislation requirements, forcing developers to double the consent request for the same purpose.

> The Authority established that the terms of the ATT policy are imposed unilaterally and harm the interests of Apple’s commercial partners. The terms were also found to be disproportionate to the achievement of the company’s stated data protection objectives.

They must think we're fucking stupid.

show 1 reply
primer42today at 3:29 PM

Apple makes, what, $1 billion (with a B) in profit every day.

So this is nothing to them.

show 1 reply
nradovtoday at 2:42 PM

I don't necessarily disagree with this ruling, but it's sad that EU governments now take in more revenue from fining US tech companies than from taxing local tech companies. An entire continent is on the path of becoming parasites instead of builders. Will they ever adopt a growth and abundance agenda again?

show 4 replies
f6vtoday at 2:30 PM

I don't download any apps anymore, so not very informed on the state of alternative app stores in EU. I decided to Google where I can find those. One of the first links is leading to MacPaw's website. It's a company with questionable ethics and business practices that tries to sell you "antivirus" and "decluttering" app. So I'll pass.

But are there any real 3rd-party AppStores for iOS now? Something that's used by more than just a couple of people? Or is EU just trying to milk rich USA tech giants (I think I know the answer).

show 2 replies