logoalt Hacker News

dvtkrlbsyesterday at 7:26 PM5 repliesview on HN

What boggles my mind is. I've been using OpenCode [1] which had this future for at least 6 months. I sometimes baffled by the slow progress of closed source software. Also highly recommend OpenCode you can also use it with your Claude subscription or Copilot one.

[1]: https://opencode.ai/


Replies

jwryesterday at 7:45 PM

I must be doing something wrong, because I can't get OpenCode to actually do anything useful, and not for lack of trying. Claude code gets me great results instantly, opencode (if I can't make it talk to a model, which isn't easy for Gemini) gets me… something, but it's nowhere near as useful as claude code. I don't know why there is so much difference, because theoretically there shouldn't be. Is it the prompt that Anthropic has been polishing in Claude code for so long?

show 1 reply
linkageyesterday at 9:09 PM

You can move quite fast when you don't have to spend half a week persuading 7 stakeholders that something is worth doing, then spend a week arguing about sprint capacity and roadmap disruptions.

SamDc73yesterday at 9:46 PM

I do like OpenCode, but I get small bugs here and there like flickering, freezing and sometimes just crash all together.

But their configuration setup is the easiest and best out of all the other CLI tools

resize2996yesterday at 7:40 PM

tbf, OpenCode's development cycle seems pretty fast. If someone announced AGI in the morning, I'd bet they have it integrated by EOD.

I also use OpenCode extensively, but bounce around to test out the other ones.

show 1 reply
kbar13yesterday at 7:38 PM

i'm not sure i agree with the assessment that claude code has been moving slowly... but it is cool that opencode has had this for a while. will def check it out