alt Hacker NewsIt doesn't sound all that similar on the surface to OP's response based on my initial read of both.
It seems like you're proposing a regulated free market in parallel with a highly regulated UBI?
It doesn't sound all that similar on the surface to OP's response based on my initial read of both.
It seems like you're proposing a regulated free market in parallel with a highly regulated UBI?
> a regulated free market in parallel with a highly regulated UBI?
No UBI. Just basics for survival guaranteed. You should not starve if you can't find work. That doesn't mean we can support a non-working population at leisure. (Which, in our current model, occurs at both ends of the income spectrum.)