logoalt Hacker News

kelnosyesterday at 8:06 PM1 replyview on HN

Ah yes, the good ol' appeal to fear. "Think of the childr--err, I mean poor defenseless woman!"

No, I don't want these cameras. I don't care if they make law enforcement's job easier. They are an invasion of privacy and a part of the disgusting dragnet surveillance state.

They need to go.

A decade ago, I was attacked on a public sidewalk by three men, who roughed me up a bit and stole from me. The police were utterly unhelpful, and as far as I know, they never caught anyone. But ultimately, that didn't really matter. I was traumatized for a while, but eventually worked through it. Whether or not they were caught would not have changed any part of that process.

I get that, emotionally, we want some sort of justice when things like this happen, but I am not willing to put up with even more constant surveillance in order to feel a little bit better about a bad thing that happened to me. I would much rather criminals sometimes went free.


Replies

SunshineTheCatyesterday at 8:20 PM

Yea I've never been a fan of the whole "makes law enforcement's job easier" arguments.

As though personal rights/liberties are trumped by a cop needing to do paperwork or leave his desk.

Plus, when you follow this to its natural/extreme conclusion, the absolute easiest thing for law enforcement would be to arrest you for no reason at all.

The rationalization for this policy of course could simply be that probable cause is "inconvenient."