This is an aside because I agree with the author’s core point, but spelling, grammatical errors, and typos actually imply something authored by a human now. This sentence:
“It affects point number 1 because AI-assisted programming is a very natural fit fot specification-driven development.”
made me smile. Reading something hand made that hadn’t been through the filters and presses of modern internet writing.
He's not a native English speaker, for starters. But I like that he didn't fill that gap with an LLM.
To my surprise, I recently found a typo in AI-generated code. It's rare though