logoalt Hacker News

CrossVRtoday at 8:11 AM2 repliesview on HN

This does nothing to protect anonymity as you are still assigned a unique code that has been tied to your ID at the liquor store.


Replies

triceratopstoday at 1:56 PM

I've never had my ID recorded at any liquor store in my life. I've bought alcohol in multiple countries. If that happens where you live I'd fight to have that practice banned legally for alcohol and tobacco purchases. Stores are definitely selling it to insurance companies.

Also after I had a certain number of birthdays, clerks have stopped demanding my ID. So my purchases are pretty much anonymous.

The card should be issued by a private company, or ideally, multiple companies. And it should be a scratch-off card with a unique code, so that codes can't be tied to transactions.

show 1 reply
fc417fc802today at 9:36 AM

Historically liquor store checks were purely visual. These days they are often digital, meaning claims about privacy might (or might not) be outdated. The general principle still applies though. The physical infrastructure already exists, the ID checks do not necessarily need to be digitized or recorded, and even if they are the issued tokens don't need to be tied to the check.

Grocery stores already sell age restricted items as well as gift cards that require activation. The state could issue "age check cards" that you could purchase for some nominal fee. That would require approximately zero additional infrastructure in most of the industrialized world. The efficacy would presumably be equivalent to that for alcohol and tobacco.

show 3 replies