> I prefer reading the LLM output for accessibility reasons.

And that's completely fine! If you prefer to read CVEs that way, nobody is going to stop you from piping all CVE descriptions you're interested in through a LLM.

However, having it processed by a LLM is essentially a one-way operation. If some people prefer the original and some others prefer the LLM output, the obvious move is to share the original with the world and have LLM-preferring readers do the processing on their end. That way everyone is happy with the format they get to read. Sounds like a win-win, no?

Unfortunately, the sheer amount of ChatGPT-processed texts being linked has for me become a reason not to want to read them, which is quite depressing.