logoalt Hacker News

shmerltoday at 3:59 AM2 repliesview on HN

> The answer was as unhelpful as possible

Looking at the answer, I wouldn't call it unhelpful. They were planning to release a source for the library that would essentially implement all the needed data interfaces? That's more than helpful and at least they responded.

I tried contacting Nuvoton for example about their documentation for some of their super I/O chips which lack Linux support (they do document a bunch of their chips pretty well, but for some weird reason not all).

Not only I got no details, I literally didn't even get a response from them at all. So above case is hugely better.


Replies

ofrzetatoday at 6:53 AM

That's what Marcus said himself, too

"<mglock> DisplayLink TM seems to be very communactive. <mglock> asked the for specs for their DL-120/DL-160 chips, and got a detailed answer withing 4 hours."

heavyset_gotoday at 4:37 AM

Go through the Linux Foundation, they have a process for accessing docs for drivers that vendors normally require NDAs with established businesses for, and won't offer random people.

show 1 reply