logoalt Hacker News

jakelazarofflast Friday at 6:34 AM2 repliesview on HN

I mean, yeah, if you omit any objectionable detail and describe it in the most generic possible terms then of course the comparison sounds tasteless and offensive. Consider that collecting child pornography is also "storing the result of an HTTP GET".


Replies

refulgentislast Friday at 6:46 AM

What was the objectionable detail I forgot to include? Feeding the HTTP GET result to an AI? Then it’s the same as slavery? Sounds clearly wrong to me.

show 1 reply
ronsorlast Friday at 6:42 AM

The objection to CSAM is rooted in how it is (inhumanely) produced; people are not merely objecting to a GET request.

show 3 replies