What's the problem with that, anyway? I object to training a machine to take/change my job [building them, telling them what to do]. What's more, they want me to pay? Hah. This isn't a charity. I either strike fortune, retire while the getting is good, or simply work harder for nothing. Hmm. I think I'll keep not displacing people, actually. Myself included.

To GP: not all of us who automate go for low hanging fruit, I guess.

To the peer calling this illegitimate [or anyone, really]: without the assistance of an LLM, please break down the foul nature of... let me check my notes, gainful employment.

> Are people here objecting to Gen AI being used to take their jobs?

Yes, even if they don't say it. The other objections largely come from the need to sound more legitimate.