You simply don't like any criticism of AI, as shown by your false assertions that Pike works at Google (he left), or the fact Google and others were trying to make their data centers emit less CO2 - and that effort is completely abandoned directly because of AI.
And you can't assert that AI is "revolutionary" and "a vague threat" at the same time. If it is the former, it can't be the latter. If it is the latter, it can't be the former.
"You can't assert that AI is "revolutionary" and "a vague threat" at the same time""
Revolutions always came with vague (or concrete) threats as far as I know.
> And you can't assert that AI is "revolutionary" and "a vague threat" at the same time.
I never asserted that AI is either of those things
> that effort is completely abandoned directly because of AI
That effort is completely abandoned because of the current US administration and POTUS a situation that big tech largely contributed to. It’s not AI that is responsible for the 180 zeitgeist change on environmental issues.