logoalt Hacker News

shkkmolast Friday at 5:26 PM1 replyview on HN

[flagged]


Replies

zephenlast Friday at 8:23 PM

> "Learning" was used by the person I responded too.

Not in the same sense.

> If you had read my comment with any care you would have realized I used the words "training" and "learning" specifically and carefully.

This is completely belied by "It works exactly the same for a LLM."

> That doesn't count as a "copy" since it isn't human-discernable.

That's not the reason it _might not_ count as a copy (the law is still not settled on this, and all the court cases have lots of caveats in the rulings), but thanks for playing.

> If you don't like being called out for lack of comprehension, then don't needlessly impose a semantic interjection

If you want to not appear mendacious, then don't claim equivalence between human learning and machine training.

> It is pretty clear this is a transformative use and so far the courts have agreed

In weak cases that didn't show exact outputs from the LLM, yes. In any case, "transformative" does not automagically transform into fair use, although it is one considered factor.

> Very mature.

Hilarious, coming from the one who wrote "if it helps your comprehension."

You must be one of those assholes who think it's OK to say mean things if you use the right words.

Bless your heart.