logoalt Hacker News

otabdeveloper4today at 8:00 AM3 repliesview on HN

If you're capable of auditing the LLM’s outputs and doing a decent code review then you don't need an LLM.


Replies

Retr0idtoday at 8:05 AM

Nobody who was writing code before LLMs existed "needs" an LLM, but they can still be handy. Procfs parsing trivialities are the kind of thing LLMs are good at, although apparently it still takes a human to say "why not using an existing library that solves this, like https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/prometheus/procfs"

show 2 replies
littlestymaartoday at 8:30 AM

Neither do you need and IDE, syntax highlighting or third party libraries, yet you use all of them.

There's nothing wrong for a software engineer about using LLMs as an additional tool in his toolbox. The problem arises when people stops doing software engineering because they believe the LLM is doing the engineering for them.

show 1 reply
saidnooneevertoday at 1:01 PM

need and can use are different things.