logoalt Hacker News

Gigachadyesterday at 12:51 AM2 repliesview on HN

You’re forgetting how this is all interconnected. Creating the large freeways creates sparse housing that requires freeways. Creating public transport does the reverse.

Before all these massive road developments it’s not like people just sat at home and couldn’t go anywhere.


Replies

Alupisyesterday at 12:59 AM

So what's your proposal? Go back in time 200 years and create a public-transit system?

The US is huge. There is no feasible way to support public transit for 95%+ of it's land-mass. That's not going to change anytime soon, or ever.

Also, most mass-transit systems in the US operate at significant loss, even with government (ie. taxpayer) funding and collecting rider-fare. A lot of public transit systems are in complete disrepair and are severely lacking. Buses and lightrails are never going to be "cheaper", as convenient or accessible as roads and vehicles are.

show 4 replies
HDThoreaunyesterday at 2:47 AM

The government built infrastructure for low density living because the vast majority of people want to live in low density suburbs, not high density urban areas. Forcing people to live in ways they don’t want to when there are viable alternatives just leads to the government being replaced.