1:1 is at least as good a default assumption.
Based on numerous studies, we already know it's not 1:1 so why bother starting with a default assumption that we know is wrong?
Do you have an alternative analysis? I'd love to check it out.
Based on numerous studies, we already know it's not 1:1 so why bother starting with a default assumption that we know is wrong?
Do you have an alternative analysis? I'd love to check it out.