logoalt Hacker News

ux266478today at 3:49 AM4 repliesview on HN

> There's no hard evidence that static typing improves reliability.

I'm curious how you came to that conclusion?

https://pleiad.cl/papers/2012/kleinschmagerAl-icpc2012.pdf

https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/an-empirical-s...


Replies

patrickmaytoday at 6:17 PM

The benefits of static typing with regard to reliability are unclear, at best:

https://danluu.com/empirical-pl/

zephentoday at 5:50 PM

If you're going to start citing research, you should look at the Cooley finding on verilog vs VHDL.

show 1 reply
pizlonatortoday at 4:00 AM

I don't consider a human subjects study to be "hard evidence".

So, we can safely disregard these papers. They got exactly the result that they sought out to get, and the papers were published because they confirmed the preexisting groupthink.

show 1 reply
rastriantoday at 3:53 AM

I was searching for the Stefik article to argue here, thank you.