alt Hacker News>Personal backup encryption with a long-lived key, passphrase-protected private key, and offline storage is a legitimate threat model
... If you're going to use a passphrase anyway why not just use a symmetric cipher?
In fact for file storage why not use an encrypted disk volume so you don't need to use PGP?
That was just me being goofy in that bit (and only that), but I hope the rest of my message went across. :)
> In fact for file storage why not use an encrypted disk volume so you don't need to use PGP?
Different threat models. Disk encryption (LUKS, VeraCrypt, plain dm-crypt) protects against physical theft. Once mounted, everything is plaintext to any process with access. File-level encryption protects files at rest and in transit: backups to untrusted storage, sharing with specific recipients, storing on systems you do not fully control. You cannot send someone a LUKS volume to decrypt one file, and backups of a mounted encrypted volume are plaintext unless you add another layer.