The whole mocks, fakes and the rest were always a terrible idea. Although people didn't realize it st the time, they were a band-aid to try to make poorly architected code testable.
90% of the time, needing to use a mock is one of the clearest code warning smells you have of there being an issue in the design your code.
It took a while, but the industry seems to be finally (although slowly) coming to this realization. And hopefully with it almost all of this can go away.
How do you substitute for dependencies that you're not testing, or that you want to deliberately break?
Ok, can someone explain this to someone with double digit iq? Is it validating the adapter idea or something else?
I agree. Tests relying on mocks rarely uncover or prevent issues. They also typically make it harder to make changes. Very bad idea that should have been left behind years ago.