Sorry, no, I'm not going to pick this apart. You wrote:

Can you please explain how lacking access to source code, being ONLY able to perform dynamic analysis, rather than dynamic analysis AND source code analysis, can ever possibly lead to an increase in the maximum possible confidence in the behavior of a given binary?

This doesn't make sense, because not having source code doesn't limit you to dynamic analysis. I assumed, 2 comments back, you were just misunderstanding SOTA reversing; you got mad at me about that. But the thing you "never stated it wasn't" is right there in the comment history. Acknowledge that and help me understand where the gap was, or this isn't worth all the words you're spending on it.