> It cannot be “good” for a social structure by definition.
Is 'good for the social structure' the metric to use for defining good? Should we be serving the social structure to be 'good'?
Hehe. These are tough questions. I had a specific scope in mind. But to answer your questions.
> Is 'good for the social structure' the metric to use for defining good?
No.
> Should we be serving the social structure to be 'good'?
Yes.
Does that make sense? :-)
Hehe. These are tough questions. I had a specific scope in mind. But to answer your questions.
> Is 'good for the social structure' the metric to use for defining good?
No.
> Should we be serving the social structure to be 'good'?
Yes.
Does that make sense? :-)