I doubt it. "hacker news" spelled lowercase? comma after "beauty"? missing "in" after "it's"? i doubt an LLM would make such syntax mistakes. it's just good writing, that's also possible these days.

There's a thing in soccer at the moment where a tackle looks fine in realtime but when the video referee shows it to the onpitch referee, they show the impact in slo-mo over and over again and it always looks way worse.

I wonder if there's something like this going on here. I never thought it was LLM on first read, and I still don't, but when you take snippets and point at them it makes me think maybe they are

Even if so, would it have mattered? The point is showing off the SQLite DB.

But it didn’t read LLM generated IMO.

Why do you say that?

> I'm really sorry to have to ask this, but this really feels like you had an LLM write it?

Ending a sentence with a question mark doesn’t automatically make your sentence a question. You didn’t ask anything. You stated an opinion and followed it with a question mark.

If you intended to ask if the text was written by AI, no, you don’t have to ask that.

I am so damn tired of the “that didn’t happen” and the “AI did that” people when there is zero evidence of either being true.

These people are the most exhausting people I have ever encountered in my entire life.