logoalt Hacker News

mjr00yesterday at 9:07 PM4 repliesview on HN

> It is like these people are hell bound to the work culture, diehard workaholics. They don't know anything else outside of a computer screen.

This is a founder/CTO. You don't get to be a founder or C-level without making work a lot more of your life than just a 9-5.

As much as people complain about the C-suite not doing anything and spending all their time golfing, they're basically on work mode 24/7. I've never worked with a C-level who didn't check emails on the weekend, wasn't willing to travel at a moment's notice to close a deal, not willing to work to resolve business or tech emergencies at 1am, etc.

On top of that they always represent the company, even in their off time. Stuff that wouldn't matter for a regular employee might lead to termination or forced resignation. For example, kissing a woman who isn't your wife at a concert.[0]

This is all true even outside of tech. Ever talk to someone who owns a restaurant? They spend weekends and nights talking to suppliers, figuring out staffing, etc...

This doesn't represent typical non-executive jobs in the software industry. Most are largely 9-5. The ones with oncall expectations tend to pay more.

[0] https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/19/business/andy-byron-astronome...


Replies

nradovyesterday at 9:11 PM

Everybody wants to be the CTO until it's time to do CTO things.

charlie0yesterday at 11:59 PM

I agree with this 100%. The thing you have to watch out for is when they try to pin similar levels of responsibility on you for very little upside.

weslleyskahyesterday at 9:16 PM

Perhaps I'm just a naive young imbecile.

Even with such a golden ticket ride to the heavens? You could do anything, focus on your family and build your little castle or depersonalize even, change countries, change your identity, make new connections, live a completely different life...

show 1 reply
pydryyesterday at 9:34 PM

Ive worked with a lot of people who sent emails at 2am and in each case it was not necessary but it was performative.

show 1 reply