What about the benefit of there being enough addresses?
The widespread deployment of NAT and VPNs has counter acted the market forces that were assumed to make IPv6 appealing.
That is a collective problem, though, not an individual one. I have always been able to get enough v4 addresses for all my needs.
There’s zero benefit to you because the carrier is NATing you for other purposes.
They get better network management.
Enough addresses for what? Nobody needs or even wants all of their devices to have globally routable addresses.
Everyone who says this is obviously a web developer.
That particular benefit has no value if you still need to support v4.
It's almost a self-inflicted tragedy of the commons or reverse network-effect.
Adopting IPv6 doesn't alleviate the pain of IPv4 exhaustion if you still need to support dual-stack.