NAT accelerated hardware exists almost everywhere now. But yes NAT is a pita overall. CGNAT is even more of a problem.
I was mostly thinking about CGNAT instead of NAT around your home network.
There is a talk by Dmitriy Melnik at RIPE 91 about the costs for ISPs to not adopt ipv6 vs to adopt ipv6 (relevant stuff starts at 9:55).
https://ripe91.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/sessions/37/8...
Not really, this is only true for mobile devices.
alt Hacker News
I was mostly thinking about CGNAT instead of NAT around your home network.
There is a talk by Dmitriy Melnik at RIPE 91 about the costs for ISPs to not adopt ipv6 vs to adopt ipv6 (relevant stuff starts at 9:55).
https://ripe91.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/sessions/37/8...