alt Hacker NewsHalf your complaints don't make sense, but most importantly if you think NAT isn't a problem and is under your control you must have never experienced the growing plague of CGNAT.
Half your complaints don't make sense, but most importantly if you think NAT isn't a problem and is under your control you must have never experienced the growing plague of CGNAT.
If the NAT function is running on a box that I can walk over and kick, then it is absolutely under my control. :)
CGNAT is a different discussion entirely. Neither the presence nor absence of upstream CGNAT changes my thoughts on locally-administrated NAT for my own LAN in IPv6 land.