logoalt Hacker News

stavroslast Sunday at 9:15 AM2 repliesview on HN

You mention a thousand ways the analogy breaks when you take it too far, but you didn't address the actual (correct) point the analogy was making: Some people don't enjoy certain parts of the creative process, and let an LLM handle them. That's all.


Replies

exceptionelast Sunday at 10:02 AM

  > Some people don't enjoy certain parts of the creative process, 
Sure

  >  and let an LLM handle them. 
This is probably the disputed part. It is not a different way of development, and as such it should not be presented like that. In software, we can use ready-made components, choose between different strategies, build everything in a low-level language etc. The trade-offs coming with each choice is in principle knowable; the developer is still in control.

LLMs are nothing like that. Using a LLM is more akin to management of outsource software development. On the surface, it might look like you get ready-made components by outsourcing it to them, but there is no contract about any standard, so you have to check everything.

Now if people would present it like "I rather manage an outsourcing process than doing the creative thing" we would have no discussion. But hammers and nails aren't the right analogies.

show 3 replies
zwnowlast Sunday at 10:33 AM

An analogy doesnt work if it has thousands of flaws.

show 1 reply