Yeah. The article was clearly "enhanced" with an LLM. Too many inane "this is not just A; this is B" sentences. Also, "why this matters" as final subheading. Fail.
this was also my experience and unfortunately, if there were any grains of value to be winnowed from the slop, I lacked the patience to continue grinding at the mill.
Who cares if it was enhanced with LLMs? That's not determinative of whether the article is accurate and valuable.