alt Hacker NewsThat's just not true, and even if LLMs did introduce more errors than humans, if you can't trust the author to proof read a summary article about his own papers, then you shouldn't trust the papers either.
That's just not true, and even if LLMs did introduce more errors than humans, if you can't trust the author to proof read a summary article about his own papers, then you shouldn't trust the papers either.
I agree with the latter. The fact that they use an LLM for the summary post without rewriting it in their own words already makes me not trust their papers.