alt Hacker NewsDepending on the crime, most people would agree that face/gait recognition is warranted, for example in case of murder or rape.
The difference here is that some people consider "illegal immigration" to be more like a misdemeanor, others consider it to be something much more serious.
Replies
15155 • last Monday at 12:27 PM
> others consider it to be something much more serious.
We have limited funds for social safety nets for our own citizens: how is it not "serious" that we would deplete them on folks who are willfully and intentionally breaking our rules for financial benefit?
➕ show 1 reply
duk3luk3 • last Monday at 9:19 AM
gait recognition is a pseudoscience.
dmitrygr • last Monday at 8:40 AM
> " others consider "
laws are knowable. readable. Opinion on them does NOT matter.
➕ show 2 replies
> Depending on the crime, most people would agree that face/gait recognition is warranted, for example in case of murder or rape
That's the problem with dragnet surveillance. People are okay with it for extreme cases. And then the scope creeps.
Free or secure. You can't have both. And you usually can't even have just the latter.